Thursday, June 08, 2006

Why Say No To Scientology?

Note: This is opinion and commentary. You may rebut the commentary via the comments section. Or you may chime in.

I received an email today that fits in with other reading I have done recently and along the years about Scientology. The references to the events taking places in Clearwater were current events for me growing up there. I imagine most people think Scientology is another one of those whackadoo religions that basically does not harm. There seems to be a difference of opinion about that. This is one of them:

"Fortunately, L. Ron Hubbard did not foresee the Internet, and there is a plethora of good material and research that has been done in the past 15 years that is widely available. A good place to start is xenu.net, which was organized and is run by a man in Norway, Andreas Heldal-Lund.
. . .

Lately, there has been a lot of attention on Scientology because of the antics of Tom Cruise. Xenu has become a household word -- or joke.

I don't think it's very effective to focus on the space opera aspect (Xenu and the Marcabs) - every religion has an origin story that sounds strange to outsiders, and they just play the 'religious tolerance' card. However...the difference is that Scientologists in good standing aren't *allowed* to learn their origin story until they've paid more than a hundred thousand dollars, or years of sweat equity as a Sea Org slave. This is NOT informed consent. (But people tend to stick on the "nut cult" aspect and ignore the bait-and-switch fraud aspect).

Scn, Inc. will counter this with the concept of "information on a gradient" -- reading about it too soon can "mess up your case." Scientologists aren't allowed to discuss their 'case" with anyone but their auditor. Messing up your case is avoided like the plague because you have to pay for and take lots of extra courses to get 'back on track' on your "Bridge to Total Freedom."

However, I DO think it's effective to remind people that Scientology has a consistent history of abusing people and the law, and it's structure resembles an Multi Level Marketing more than a church. For instance, a Scientology FSM (Field Staff Minister) is rewarded with a percentage of every book, course, or bust of L Ron Hubbard he can get you to buy. The best FSMs make a lot of money.

There are no programs to serve the hungry, poor or elderly. Scientology is about "making the able more able." You don't see disabled people in Scientology. If you have a disability, it's something that is considered YOUR fault - YOU "pulled it in." and if you still have to be in a wheelchair, it's because you're not practicing Scientology correctly. Pretty convenient, eh? There's a lot of brushing close to practicing medicine without a license in this organization.

They do have several brands of literacy programs, like Way to Happiness, that they claim are secular. However, all materials are written by Hubbard, no outside materials are allowed except a dictionary, and that's pretty much all the program is - looking up words you don't understand.

They also have Narconon (NOT affiliated with similarly-spelled NarcAnon), which is considered internally to be an Inroad to Scientology - basically replacing addiction to drugs with addiction to Scientology. The reason they're so against psychiatric drugs is that they have a jihad against mental health professionals in general, and a GOAL of destroying psychiatry --because they view psychiatry as a *competitor*. They think if they can align mental health with Big Pharm, a lot of people will follow. They do this primarily through the front group,
Citizens' Commission on Human Rights. When you read the purpose statement for this group, it has nothing to do with human rights, and everything to do with destroying psychiatry and mental health professions.
There is a lot of material online about Narconon and the "Purification Rundown" that has no peer-reviewed proof it works and may be downright dangerous.

The biggest problems I have with Scientology are:

--No informed consent

--This group is the largest organization INDICTED for infiltrating US Government offices (in the late 1970s, raids on Scn HQ in Clearwater revealed Operation Snow White, a program where government files were stolen, information that made scientology look bad were replace with "good" information. That and other operations, like Operation Tricycle and Operation Speedy Gonzalez were designed to "safe point" Clearwater for Scientology expansion, and destroy opposition - such as Gabriel Cazares, who was mayor at the time. They tried to set him up in a fake hit and run, and destroy his marriage and political career. he took them to court, and they settled - but the files are sealed and part of the settlement was a gag order. The church is embarrassed about this, and will insist that reforms were made. The only reform was that the church's "Guardian's Office" was renamed "Office of Special Affairs" or OSA. ALL of the policies are still in force.) Hubbard's own wife was one of 11 who went to jail over this.

--Written policy of attacking those who disagree or stand in the way of Scientology progress. One policy is called Fair Game, another KSW - Keeping Scientology Working. Fair Game, the name of the policy that instructs Scientologists to utterly destroy opposition through any means necessary. "they can be sued, lied to or harassed." The purpose of the lawsuit is not to win, but to shudder a critic into silence. They will also send PIs to dig through your trash. The policy says it's OK to manufacture crimes if none exist. If you're a critic, you have to have crimes, becuase Hubbard said all critics are only critics because they are criminals who know Scientology will create a civilization without crime.


Now they'll tell you Fair Game was rescinded, and name a policy letter that says so. However, if you read the actual policy letter, it simply says the NAME Fair Game is all that has been rescinded, because it causes bad PR. But nothing in the policy itself has changed.

--High-pressure sales techniques are taught, including "Training Routine - L" or "TR-L" where one is literally taught to lie with a straight face. Policy of disconnection from families if they don't completely accept your sojourn into Scientology and won't give you money for courses.

--The whole thing is a bait and switch - "you can be a scientologist and a Christian" is simply wrong. Christians . . . don't believe in reincarnation. But as a Scientologist, you aren't told that you are supposed to believe in it until you've paid a lot of money -- and that knowledge is provided simply as incentive to pay more to get rid of all the bad engrams in all your *previous* lives, after you've spent a ton getting rid of this life's engrams. Leisa Goodman, a spokesperson for Scientology, stated "we are not a turn-the-other-cheek kind of religion."

--Too many sad stories of people going off their meds to try to be good scientologists with tragic results.

Here's an example: You're taught in Dianetics (Book One to Scientologists) that you have a "reactive" and an "analytical" mind, and the source of all your troubles is your "reactive" mind. Once you accept that this exists, you're told that "engrams" or bad memories, continue to affect you and cause all your problems. But Scientology can help you with that by "auditing" - locating the source of the bad memory, and rendering it neutral. Auditing costs a lot of money. It costs a lot to become an auditor, too, and pay licensing fees and such. Ok, follow here --
The goal, when you get rid of all your engrams, is the state of Clear (which doesn't exist any more than the reactive mind does). Hubbard wrote that Clears never get colds, and have all kinds of enhanced powers. In order to reach Clear, you have to have a "cognition" - this is required of every course you take in Scn. But you're not allowed to talk about any of this stuff with anyone else.

The Clear "cognition" is this: I mock up my reactive mind.

So in other words, Hubbard sells you on a structure, then makes YOU admit that you made it all up -- you therefore have made up all your problems, too."



Here is a timeline that I found:
http://www.shipbrook.com/jeff/CoS/timeline.html

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Amazing that there are so many Scientologists in the Tampa Bay area yet I don't know a single one. I know many people, but no Scientologists. I've seen them out on 7th Avenue quite a few times offering "free personality tests." I want to ask one--very respectfully, of course--"Dude, this Xenu thing, come one, you really believe that??? You know L. Ron Hubbard WAS a sci-fi author, after all?" Yes, if I could meet a Scientologist that is exactly what I would ask.

CouldBeSherry said...

hocus pocus dominocus! Engrams, outgrams. What a bunch of double speak for people with absolutely no minds of their own!

AngelSil said...

Excellent letter. There was a good article written last year about Scientology's history with the press. It ran in Salon and can be read here. There is no question that Scientology is a scam based to part people and their money.

Anonymous said...

My 16 year-old son and two of his friends from Hillsborough High School were whiling away a Saturday in Ybor. The two girls wanted to go into the Scientology Mission to look around. The girls agreed to take the "Free Stress Test". When they did, it turned out that the mission had results of an earlier "stress test" that one of the girls took somewhere. That means, they were keeping records of a potentially damaging and certainly personal nature on a child that was under 15 without any consent from anyone. To me, that's dangerous and could well be abused! Noone should take their "stress test". They keep records.

Needless to say, the scientologists told the girl that she was under lots of "stress" and should come back for some of their services (not free). They told this 16 year-old that she really needed their help because she obviously had lots of issues, etc.
That's very irresponsible. They are not licensed counselors or anything and they are dealing with minors and no parental consent!
Yes, it's a gimmick to make money. Yes, I've seen their catalogs and their techs and rundowns cost in the thousands of dollars. I saw prices like $10,000 to $50,000 and that was 6 years ago.

AngelSil said...

Shayna,

There is a big difference between a religion and a cult and I don't think you see that definition. While I don't agree with a lot of what the 'big' religions believe or how some of their members act, I don't feel they are a danger to the community or their members. Scientology is.

I, too, have known Scientologists and *ex* Scientologists. Your friends probably don't know about Xenu and the background of the cult because it's not taught until you spend (literally) thousands of dollars in 'training'.

I ask you - what other "religion" requires you to PAY to be a member and receive guidance? All churches and synagogues encourage and welcome donations but I can't think of a single one that *requires* it. If Scientology were really concerned with helping people with their lives, they wouldn't be charging insane amounts to do it.

Do the research. It's a cult and a dangerous one at that.

Anonymous said...

I see both points however I also see "as long as they don’t bother me I wont bother with them." I agree. As long as they aren't sacrificing goats in my front yeard while setting my trash cans on fire they bother me about as much as tranny hookers and eight thousand pawn shops.

Anonymous said...

One other "religion" that requires you to pay to be a member is Amway.

If you want to see the South Park/Scientology episode that Tom Cruise stopped Comedy Central from broadcasting:
http://www.hedning.no/humor/southpark/english.html

Anonymous said...

These guys are amateurs compared to catholics in being evil.

All religions are a scam.

Anonymous said...

Other religions may not "require" you to pay, but the tithe was invented for a reason. I don't think you'd be made very welcome at Idlewild Baptist's new monstrosity if you showed up every week without something for the collection plate.
Cult or not though, the statement made in the post above - that Phil Alessi should not rent to them - starts things down a very slippery slope. Can you, as a landlord, deny someone the right to lease your property based on their religion? I don't think so.

David Scott Banghart said...

Good point about slippery slope. Here is the Fair Housing Act. However does it apply to non-housing transactions?

Fair Housing Act
Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Fair Housing Act), as amended, prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of dwellings, and in other housing-related transactions, based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status (including children under the age of 18 living with parents of legal custodians, pregnant women, and people securing custody of children under the age of 18), and handicap (disability).

David Scott Banghart said...

I could watch all sorts of Christian worship services on TV. Same with Christian commentary and other education about Christianity for free. I could skip the service and go to Sunday School and not pay the tithe. I taught a Wednesday night bible class and there was no collection. I ca nbuy or read for free all sorts of books on Christianity.


The difference also is that the tithe does not have to be 10%. You give what you want. Often times you get envelopes to put the offering in, and I could put a dollar in and noone would be the wiser.

I reject your comparison of tithing and the purchases Scientologists have to make in order to advance to learn the Central mysteries of their belief system.

Most other religions tell you up front what their core beliefs are. You don't have to buy your way in to learn.

Anonymous said...

While the basic principles of the landlord-tenant relationship are the same in both the residential and commercial contexts, there are a few differences between the two. For example, parties to a commercial lease are treated under the law as being equal, sophisticated bargaining partners. Thus, there is generally less in the way of legal protections offered to commercial lessees than to residential lessees.

Anonymous said...

It would have been ok had Phil Alessi called downtown to find out what he needed to do first before opening.
He moved them in very quietly (almost overnight.)
Next thing that came was the magazines (no personality test.)
If you read in the above articles from the 1980's pulitzer prize winners, they did the same thing in Clearwater.
They are very quiet when they move in so as not to arouse suspicion.
Then, they even used a different name.
They also "LEASED" the property before they bought.
The same thing they are doing now.
They are not operating legally.
No decent church is going to hide and operate illegally.
The neighbors are supposed to have a say when zoning changes are made.
They didn't ask us or anything.
I am tired of the lemon vehicles, the huge trucks, the crooked fence, the trash.
If Phil cared about the neighborhood, he would have made some of this stuff right.